Drugs - It's Time for Better Laws
Release decided to launch the 'Drugs - It's Time for Better Laws' campaign to highlight the negative impact of the current policy and the need for change. This is why:
In 2010 nearly 80,000[1] people in England and Wales were found guilty of or cautioned for possession of an illegal drug - most were young, black or poor. The young in particular, are affected by these laws with 24,000[2] being cautioned or prosecuted for possession of a drug, primarily cannabis. Since the introduction of the Misuse of Drugs Act 40 years ago, millions of people have been criminalised; in the last ten years alone nearly 1 million people have been cautioned or prosecuted in England and Wales for possession of drugs. There is no evidence that the risk of criminal sanctions deters people from using drugs[3]. The harms caused by criminalising large sections of society are well established and lead to significant wasted resources. At a time when the country is facing the deepest spending cuts in modern history wasting enormous resources to police and prosecute individuals for drug possession is unacceptable.
A criminal record can have a serious impact on educational aspirations. Young people can avoid entering professions such as health, law and working with young or vulnerable people because their record may prevent them from gaining a job in those areas. For those employed as teachers, doctors or nurses an arrest and conviction for drug possession can result in them being barred from working in their profession[4]. Just an arrest for a drugs offence can make it extremely difficult for people to travel to other countries. Consider the economic costs of this wasted potential. Criminalising people who use drugs leads to greater social exclusion and stigmatisation making it much more difficult to play a productive role in society.
Decriminalisation of possession of drugs is one way of overcoming the negative impact of the current system. Portugal adopted a decriminalisation model in 2001 - this saw the introduction of a civil system of dealing with all cases of drug possession. People caught in possession still face sanctions such as a fine, or referral to a treatment programme if they use drugs problematically, however they do not receive a criminal record. Since the introduction of the new model in 2001, Portugal has seen a small rise in the number of people using drugs (there has also been increase in neighbouring countries), however the number of young people using drugs has reduced, as has the number of people who use drugs problematically.
Release supports decriminalisation on pragmatic grounds. The current system of criminalisation creates harms and does not deter drug use. Drug use is a matter of health and education not criminalisation. It is time to stop pointlessly criminalising large sections of society.
Niamh Eastwood
[1] Ministry of Justice, Criminal Justice Annual Report 2010, Conviction Tables, Table A.4 (http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/statistics-and-data/criminal-justice/criminal-annual.htm)
[2] Ibid.
[3] Stevens, A. & Reuter, P., An Analysis of UK Drug Policy, 2007, UKDPC, page 10 - found that there was little evidence that drug policy impacted on number of users.
[4] The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 details how a criminal record becomes ‘spent', that is not necessary to disclose, however this does not apply to a range of professions who will always be required to disclose a record.
| < Prev |
|---|


Comments
http://www.buydutchseeds.com/
The really sad thing is how this train of thought can be transfered to other areas of crime and i mean the most dispicaple crimes. Because it becomes acceptable to murder a drug taker or a prostitute, thus a trend is created and until we address this problem, a fear will continue to escalate which means more irresponsable drug taking or problematic use of private time which has nothing to do with a overseer unless it is to some good
I think we need to allow users to assess the risks themselves, but also they need to be protected from criminals who are polluting their supply and profiteering from their often innocent pleasure.
Regulation will also be able to control strength of drugs, much as we do with alcohol. I would say that some strains of cannabis could well be stronger these days, just like people prefer whiskey to beer, there is often a drive for stronger, faster satisfaction. What our government have to realise is even though this could be true, many people are sensible enough to not down a pint of whiskey!
The Misuse of Drugs Act seems to be an act that successive governments are unwilling to amend. Many hide behind the argument that the UN conventions state that states should not allow any danger to public health. I don't know how having an unregulated supply of drugs contributes to this. On the same lines, politicians state that cannabis in particular can cause mental illness & this is because the type of cannabis smoked now is stronger. It is true that in a small number of cases for those with a pre-disposition to such illnesses this could be true. Both arguments can be countered with a call for regulation